Monday, April 7, 2008
A Day Late
Most Water Control Districts such as Esperanza go through an Ordinance process. Instead, the City did it through resolution, which didn’t allow for public hearings. Even with this, Mayor Heckler could have held Town Hall meetings so citizens could ask questions of Council about the development.
Instead, at the first Special Meeting to vote on Esperanza, Mayor Heckler tried to limit the citizen comment portion to 45 minutes and said he was going to ‘randomly’ decide who should speak. Only after objections by Councilman Zeigler, did that change.
Councilwoman Edmondson seemed concerned that advocating for broader participation and information would indicate a distrust of City staff and their lawyer, paid for by Esperanza. While she may have been satisfied with their conclusions, she should have allowed more time to address her constituents’ dissatisfaction.
Councilman Warden (who received over half of his donations from Esperanza related donors), expressed impatience during a January Council meeting, interrupting Councilman Zeigler’s questions and urging to get on with a vote. Now we’ve seen Warden telling the press that he agrees the process could have been more open, and that he has emailed the City Manager and Mayor with suggestions on how to do it better next time.
What of Councilman Dubose? Not only did he vote against a 30-day extension for more public input but he also opposed a miserly 6 more days for citizen review of what the city attorney has called the most complicated agreement in the state.
Last June, a year after his election, and just days after Governor Perry signed the bill for Esperanza’s water district, Dubose received his largest reported contribution- $2000. This was from a member of the family who sold the land for Esperanza.
Whoever fills a politician’s coffers is the best indication of whom they will represent.
At his Open House this week, Mayor Heckler actually claimed that he did not speak in favor of Esperanza at any time. One might argue that the trip he made to Austin with employees of Esperanza to lobby Representative Macias for the development, spoke volumes.
So, if you find some of these folks are suddenly talking about ‘public misperceptions,’ their wanting Boerne to stay small, ‘not being pro-Esperanza’ and the need for more public participation and transparency, caution; it is simply the sound of politicians running for cover. Which reminds me of another old saying: ‘Actions speak louder than words.’
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
How Safe is YOUR Neighborhood?

On February 12, the night of the historic vote on Esperanza, The City Council had a hearing at 7pm to listen to arguments both for and against the change in zoning use at 507 Frey Street, which is an R-1 residential neighborhood. The request was made by the Hill Country Christian Action Council, dba: The Hill Country Pregnancy Care Center . The Pregnancy Care Center is a good organization and provides needed services for our community . It is not what they do , but how they want to do it.
An ordinance was past last year by the Boerne City Council to allow 501 © (3), non profit corporations to be located in an R-1 residential neighborhood by using the existing housing stock so that the neighborhood would not be negatively impacted. Just as important, it is clear in the ordinance that when the building is vacated it must revert back to it’s original use, R-1 residential.
The Pregnancy Center bought the property at 507 Frey with a 900 square foot home on it. They knew this house would not meet their needs and they plan to demolish it and build a 6000 square foot medical facility , a paved parking lot and erect a 15 square foot sign.
In an article in the Boerne Star , they claimed that “they have been given a favorable reception by the Frey Street residents”. This gave the erroneous impression that the neighbors had been consulted and were supportive. I can honestly say there was not a favorable reception . We submitted 81 signatures from 65 residences in the Frey street neighborhood who were against the ordinance.
Additionally, Councilman Jacque Dubose, sits on the board of the Directors of the Hill Country Pregnancy Care Center.
The City Attorney said that Jacque Dubose legally did not have a conflict of interest in this matter. Jacque Dubose said he could vote objectively for the interests of the citizens of Boerne. Yet as a director of the HCCPC he is charged with the responsibility to do everything to further the mission of the organization. He has taken a personal interest in the pregnancy care center and he cannot act with independence and impartiality, legally or not. The citizens of Boerne are entitled to have a fair, ethical and accountable local government.
In closing, it is not over yet. This item was taken off the Agenda until further notice.
The way ordinance was written, a 501 © (3) can go into any neighborhood in Boerne , next door or across the street from your house with City Council approval.
Ted and Janis Maxymof
Friday, February 29, 2008
Power to the People

In political terminology, these tools enable citizens to bypass their government by creating new laws, nullifying existing laws, and removing elected officials. The first state to adopt these tools was South Dakota in 1898. Since then, 23 other states have included them in their constitutions, the most recent being Mississippi in 1992. Unfortunately, Texas is not one of those states, however the City of Boerne’s Home Rule Charter does provide these powerful tools for its voting citizens.
The Initiative allows the voters the power to propose ordinances to the Council. If the Council fails to adopt an ordinance the voters have the power to adopt or reject it in a City election
The Referendum allows the voters the power to require reconsideration by the Council of any adopted ordinance. If the Council fails to repeal the ordinance, the voters have the power to approve or reject it at a City election.
The Recall allows voters to petition for recall of the Mayor or any member of the City Council, and thereby remove him from office.
When it is clear the Boerne City Council is not representing the desires of the majority of its citizens, these powerful tools should be seriously considered.